![]() ![]() Perhaps, these arguments are in fact, at least, somewhat new arguments for God’s existence (though not totally original arguments). Or, maybe these arguments are just re-interpretations of what Feser thinks certain thinkers have claimed. Given that these arguments have been so misunderstood, I am hoping that this book reinvigorates discussion about said arguments between professional philosophers and laypeople alike, especially since I think Feser didn’t address some of the strongest objections to his arguments. In addition, I liked how he also had a section with each argument where he would lay out the argument in a formal way. With the arguments themselves, Feser is pretty clear about what is (and is not) being said. Feser himself can be quite clear in his writing, especially considering he is dealing with complex language and metaphysics.Įven though I still have serious doubts about these arguments, Feser does a great job responding to a multitude of misunderstandings and bad objections to the arguments. ![]() ![]() The book is not too long, but it’s not too short either. I must say that I quite enjoyed “Five Proofs of the existence of God”. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |